Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 987 days newer than Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 4% better in Dota 2 than Core i3-9100F - 212 vs 203 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Buy for £108.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |