Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 294 days older than Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 3% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Celeron G6900 - 188 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for £101.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74697 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Single-Core
1603
81.74400815910249%
Multi-Core
2696
35.436382754994746%
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |