Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1092 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 10% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-9400F - 126 vs 115 FPS
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - £66.49 vs £127.89
- Up to 52% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-9400F - £0.53 vs £1.11 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 6 vs 2 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
126
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.53/FPS
100%
Price, £
£66.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £66.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 409 minutes ago
Buy for £127.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |