Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 614 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - £66.49 vs £119.95
- Up to 42% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-10600KF - £0.53 vs £0.92 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 3% better in The Callisto Protocol than Celeron G6900 - 130 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
126
96%
Value, £/FPS
£0.53/FPS
100%
Price, £
£66.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £66.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
130
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.92/FPS
57%
Price, £
£119.95
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for £119.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |