Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 912 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 65% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - £50.0 vs £142.49
- Up to 64% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen 7 3700X - £0.12 vs £0.33 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron G6900 - 426 vs 424 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
Buy for £142.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |