Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-6600K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2084 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-6600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-6600K - 128 vs 122 FPS
- Up to 4% cheaper than Core i5-6600K - £132.79 vs £138.88
- Up to 9% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-6600K - £1.04 vs £1.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600K - 12 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
128
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.04/FPS
100%
Price, £
£132.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £132.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11602 minutes ago
Buy for £138.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11602 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |