Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7600K is 840 days older than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i5-7600K - £120.0 vs £151.0
- Up to 19% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-7600K - £1.13 vs £1.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-7600K - 65 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Performs up to 3% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-9100F - 109 vs 106 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
106
97%
Value, £/FPS
£1.13/FPS
100%
Price, £
£120
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
Buy for £151 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i5-7600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |