Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 1362 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 40% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600 - £108.88 vs £182.99
- Up to 35% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 5 7600 - £0.53 vs £0.81 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-9100F - 227 vs 204 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
204
89%
Value, £/FPS
£0.53/FPS
100%
Price, £
£108.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £108.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
Buy for £182.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |