Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600K is 693 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 4% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - £120.0 vs £125.43
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 15% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Core i3-9100F - 148 vs 129 FPS
- Up to 9% better value when playing Grand Theft Auto V than Core i3-9100F - £0.85 vs £0.93 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7421 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
148
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.85/FPS
100%
Price, £
£125.43
95%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £125.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7421 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |