Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 693 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - £108.88 vs £132.79
- Up to 12% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-11400F - £0.83 vs £0.94 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-9100F - 142 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 12 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
131
92%
Value, £/FPS
£0.83/FPS
100%
Price, £
£108.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £108.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6786 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
142
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.94/FPS
88%
Price, £
£132.79
81%
FPS Winner
Buy for £132.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6785 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |