Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 621 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 6% better in Dirt 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 180 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - £99.99 vs £120.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 24 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for £120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74071 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
170
94.44444444444444%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
£99.99
100%
Buy for £99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74071 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
85.44395924308587%
Multi-Core
6976
100%
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |