Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 1973 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - £99.99 vs £117.71
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 15% better in Watch Dogs: Legion than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 157 vs 137 FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 60 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Watch Dogs: Legion
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
137
87.26114649681529%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
£99.99
100%
Buy for £99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78012 minutes ago
Buy for £117.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78011 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
52.10830004438527%
Multi-Core
6976
95.0797328608423%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 60 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |