Buy on Amazon
£117.71
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $134
Availability
MSRP in USD: $134
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 4% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i3-10105F - 226 vs 217 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 60 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - £77.03 vs £117.71
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel® Core™ i3-13100 Desktop Processor 4 cores (4 P-cores + 0 E-cores) 12MB Cache, up to 4.5 GHz
Buy for £117.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74141 minutes ago
Intel Core i3-10105F 10th Generation - Desktop processor (3.7 GHz Tuboboost: 4.4 GHz, 4 cores, LGA1200) BX8070110105F
Buy for £77.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i3-13100
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
1454
64.53617399023524%
Multi-Core
4472
60.9513425105629%
Intel Core i3-13100 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
