Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 320 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - £69.82 vs £224.84
- Up to 69% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-10400 - £0.4 vs £1.28 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-10105F - 176 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
175
99%
Value, £/FPS
£0.4/FPS
100%
Price, £
£69.82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £69.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
176
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.28/FPS
31%
Price, £
£224.84
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for £224.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |