Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-7600K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 1533 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-7600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 10% better in Rust than Core i5-7600K - 220 vs 200 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i5-7600K - £132.79 vs £151.0
- Up to 21% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-7600K - £0.6 vs £0.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-7600K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600K - 12 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for £151 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10728 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
220
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.6/FPS
100%
Price, £
£132.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £132.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10727 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7600K | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |