Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield IV than Core i5-10600KF - 441 vs 428 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - £119.95 vs £132.79
- Up to 7% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i5-11400F - £0.28 vs £0.3 per FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
441
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.3/FPS
93%
Price, £
£132.79
90%
FPS Winner
Buy for £132.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11241 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
428
97%
Value, £/FPS
£0.28/FPS
100%
Price, £
£119.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £119.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11241 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |