Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - £151.0 vs £179.99
- Up to 10% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-13400F - £0.75 vs £0.83 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Valheim than Core i5-7600K - 217 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600K - 16 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for £151 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11819 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
217
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.83/FPS
90%
Price, £
£179.99
83%
FPS Winner
Buy for £179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11818 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7600K | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
91 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |