Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 1818 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-4690 - 174 vs 173 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690 - 65 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - £44.99 vs £120.0
- Up to 62% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-9100F - £0.26 vs £0.69 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for £120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
173
99%
Value, £/FPS
£0.26/FPS
100%
Price, £
£44.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £44.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i5-4690 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |