Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7100 outperforms the more expensive FX-4350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7100 is 1345 days newer than the more expensive FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 15% better in World of Warcraft than FX-4350 - 178 vs 155 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than FX-4350 - £58.88 vs £59.97
- Up to 15% better value when playing World of Warcraft than FX-4350 - £0.33 vs £0.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
178
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.33/FPS
100%
Price, £
£58.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £58.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100 | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |