Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - £58.88 vs £69.8
- Up to 11% better value when playing Rust than Core i3-10105F - £0.31 vs £0.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 5% better in Rust than Core i3-7100 - 197 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
188
95%
Value, £/FPS
£0.31/FPS
100%
Price, £
£58.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £58.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14741 minutes ago
Buy for £69.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14740 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |