Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - £58.88 vs £100.68
- Up to 41% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i3-10105 - £0.39 vs £0.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Core i3-7100 - 152 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
150
98%
Value, £/FPS
£0.39/FPS
100%
Price, £
£58.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £58.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14148 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
152
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.66/FPS
59%
Price, £
£100.68
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for £100.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |