Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-4690 - 188 vs 183 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - £44.88 vs £77.03
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £77.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74242 minutes ago
Buy for £44.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74243 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1191
81.91196698762036%
Multi-Core
3303
73.85957066189624%
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i5-4690 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |