Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1585 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 27% better in Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than FX-4350 - 112 vs 88 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 63% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - £59.97 vs £163.79
- Up to 53% better value when playing Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - £0.68 vs £1.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
112
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.46/FPS
46%
Price, £
£163.79
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for £163.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
Whitehaven | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |