Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1823 days newer than Core i5-3330.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 10% better in New World than Core i5-3330 - 109 vs 99 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 77 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for £59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75018 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
555
47.51712328767123%
Multi-Core
1643
28.356920952709704%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i5-3330 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |