Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 35 days older than the cheaper Core i3-8100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Up to 63% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - £59.99 vs £163.75
- Up to 63% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - £0.32 vs £0.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
190
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.86/FPS
37%
Price, £
£163.75
36%
Buy for £163.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13582 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
190
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.32/FPS
100%
Price, £
£59.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13582 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |