Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9600K is 414 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i5-9600K - £163.75 vs £168.88
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 9% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 112 vs 103 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - £1.51 vs £1.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
103
91%
Value, £/FPS
£1.59/FPS
94%
Price, £
£163.75
100%
Buy for £163.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19335 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
112
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.51/FPS
100%
Price, £
£168.88
96%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £168.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19334 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |