Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3570K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1950 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3570K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 25% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-3570K - 332 vs 266 FPS
- Up to 6% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-3570K - £0.49 vs £0.52 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570K - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570K
- Up to 15% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - £138.99 vs £163.79
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 77 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
332
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.49/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.79
84%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £163.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
Buy for £138.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 380 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i5-3570K |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |