Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 1314 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 6% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 326 vs 307 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - £99.99 vs £125.43
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 24 vs 12 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for £125.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74065 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
307
94.1717791411043%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
£99.99
100%
Buy for £99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74065 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
53.70539798719122%
Multi-Core
6976
81.31483855927264%
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |