Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-14100F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-11600K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-14100F is 1028 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-11600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-14100F - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-11600K - 188 vs 184 FPS
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - £87.44 vs £125.43
- Up to 31% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-11600K - £0.47 vs £0.68 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for £125.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78252 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
188
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.47/FPS
100%
Price, £
£87.44
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £87.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78252 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |