Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 3% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-10600KF - 142 vs 138 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - £119.95 vs £169.99
- Up to 27% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-11600K - £0.87 vs £1.2 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
142
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.2/FPS
72%
Price, £
£169.99
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for £169.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12275 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
138
97%
Value, £/FPS
£0.87/FPS
100%
Price, £
£119.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £119.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12276 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |