Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2558 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - £39.99 vs £221.93
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than FX-6350 - 154 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75915 minutes ago
Buy for £221.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75916 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |