Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 3547 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 77% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600 - £39.99 vs £177.67
- Up to 62% better value when playing Rust than Ryzen 5 7600 - £0.26 vs £0.69 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 66% better in Rust than FX-6350 - 257 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
155
60.311284046692606%
Value, £/FPS
£0.26/FPS
100%
Price, £
£39.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58092 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
257
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.69/FPS
37.68115942028986%
Price, £
£177.67
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for £177.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58092 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |