Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700 is 2185 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i7-9700 - £49.99 vs £240.0
- Up to 78% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-9700 - £0.26 vs £1.18 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Performs up to 7% better in Valheim than FX-6350 - 203 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
Buy for £240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |