Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700T outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700T is 1799 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i7-8700T - £39.99 vs £271.36
- Up to 84% better value when playing Stray than Core i7-8700T - £0.23 vs £1.48 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Performs up to 4% better in Stray than FX-6350 - 183 vs 176 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
176
96.17486338797814%
Value, £/FPS
£0.23/FPS
100%
Price, £
£39.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2719 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
183
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.48/FPS
15.54054054054054%
Price, £
£271.36
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for £271.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2720 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700T |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |