Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8600K outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8600K is 1620 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i5-8600K - £39.99 vs £178.88
- Up to 75% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i5-8600K - £0.25 vs £1.0 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600K
- Performs up to 13% better in No Man's Sky than FX-6350 - 178 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 528 minutes ago
Buy for £178.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 240 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i5-8600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 6 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |