Buy on Amazon
£49.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700K outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700K is 1345 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-7700K - £49.99 vs £248.88
- Up to 76% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i7-7700K - £0.08 vs £0.34 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700K
- Performs up to 21% better in Minecraft than FX-6350 - 727 vs 603 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 91 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
AMD FX-6350 Black Edition CPU (AM3+, Hex Core, 3.90GHz, 14MB, 125W, Advanced Bit Manipulation)
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-7700K 4.2 GHz QuadCore 8MB Cache Processor
Buy for £248.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Core i7-7700K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i7-7700K |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| FX | Collection | Core i7 |
| Vishera | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
| 6 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 91 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
