Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 2260 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 68% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - £39.99 vs £124.0
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 41% better in Starfield than FX-6350 - 62 vs 44 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 16 vs 6 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 262 minutes ago
Buy for £124 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 262 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |