Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2260 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 38% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - £52.95 vs £85.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing Remnant II than Ryzen 5 3600 - £0.67 vs £0.94 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 14% better in Remnant II than FX-6350 - 90 vs 79 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £52.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3261 minutes ago
Buy for £85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3261 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |