Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 1973 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 17% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $504.79 vs $604.65
- Up to 8% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $2.34 vs $2.55 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 263 vs 239 FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 120 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
239
91%
Value, €/FPS
€2.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€560.32
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €560.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
263
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.55/FPS
92%
Price, €
€671.16
83%
FPS Winner
Buy for €671.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |