Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 1874 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 263 vs 239 FPS
- Up to 39% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $309.14 vs $504.79
- Up to 44% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $1.30 vs $2.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 170 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
239
91%
Value, €/FPS
€2.34/FPS
56%
Price, €
€560.32
61%
Buy for €560.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
263
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€343.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €343.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |