Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 696 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 24% better in FIFA 23 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 179 vs 144 FPS
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $104.94 vs $504.79
- Up to 83% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.65 vs $3.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
144
80%
Value, €/FPS
€3.89/FPS
17%
Price, €
€560.32
20%
Buy for €560.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
179
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€116.48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €116.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |