Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X is 1183 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5800X
- Performs up to 29% better in Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 71 vs 55 FPS
- Up to 71% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $145.28 vs $504.79
- Up to 78% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $2.27 vs $10.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 105 vs 180 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
55
77%
Value, €/FPS
€10.19/FPS
22%
Price, €
€560.32
28%
Buy for €560.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
71
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€161.26
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €161.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Ryzen 7 5800X |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |