Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 1183 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 217 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 45% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $279.19 vs $504.79
- Up to 49% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $1.43 vs $2.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 105 vs 180 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
201
93%
Value, €/FPS
€2.79/FPS
51%
Price, €
€560.32
55%
Buy for €560.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
217
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€309.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €309.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |