Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-12700K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-12700K is 1547 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-12700K - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Core i7-12700K
- Performs up to 19% better in Battlefield V than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 278 vs 234 FPS
- Up to 67% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $168.01 vs $504.79
- Up to 72% better value when playing Battlefield V than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.67 vs $2.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
234
84%
Value, €/FPS
€2.39/FPS
28%
Price, €
€560.32
33%
Buy for €560.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
278
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€186.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €186.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Core i7-12700K |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |