Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-14900K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-14900K is 2259 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 13% better in Dead Space than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 169 vs 149 FPS
- Up to 31% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $346.43 vs $504.79
- Up to 39% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $2.28 vs $3.76 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
149
88%
Value, €/FPS
€3.76/FPS
61%
Price, €
€560.32
68%
Buy for €560.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
169
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€384.54
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €384.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 24 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |