Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 1874 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 23% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 298 vs 242 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $406.52 vs $504.79
- Up to 35% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $1.51 vs $2.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 170 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
242
81%
Value, €/FPS
€2.32/FPS
65%
Price, €
€560.32
80%
Buy for €560.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
298
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€451.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €451.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |