Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-13700K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-13700K is 1874 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-13700K - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 10% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 196 vs 178 FPS
- Up to 49% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $259.70 vs $504.79
- Up to 53% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $1.47 vs $3.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
178
91%
Value, €/FPS
€3.15/FPS
47%
Price, €
€560.32
51%
Buy for €560.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
196
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€288.27
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €288.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |