Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12400 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12400 is 1608 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 14% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 193 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $105.50 vs $504.79
- Up to 82% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.61 vs $3.30 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €560.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€117.11
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €117.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |