Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4102 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 26% better in Sons Of The Forest than FX-6100 - 113 vs 90 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$99.02 vs CA$519.18
- Up to 76% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Core i9-13900F - CA$1.1 vs CA$4.59 per FPS
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
113
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.59/FPS
23%
Price, CA$
CA$519.18
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$519.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
90
79%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.1/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$99.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$99.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |