Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2750 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - CA$98.43 vs CA$145.0
- Up to 24% better value when playing Saints Row than Core i3-9100F - CA$0.68 vs CA$0.9 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 11% better in Saints Row than FX-6100 - 161 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
145
90%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.68/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
161
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.9/FPS
75%
Price, CA$
CA$145
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |